http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1433 2026-04-13T12:22:59Z 2026-04-13T12:22:59Z Human Sciences, Research Council http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1658 2025-07-30T09:49:48Z 2025-07-30T00:00:00Z

Development of a Climate Change Jurisdiction Vulnerability Index in South Africa Human Sciences, Research Council Climate change is an escalating global crisis characterised by rising temperatures, shifting weather patterns, and increasing frequency of extreme weather events. These changes have far-reaching impacts on natural ecosystems and human societies, with significant consequences for communities worldwide. This pilot study aimed to establish a Climate Change Jurisdictional Vulnerability Index (CC-JVI) to assess community-level vulnerabilities in the face of climate change in South Africa. The research revealed significant disparities in the availability and quality of data across targeted communities, which affected accurate vulnerability assessments. The key objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of utilising local-level data for the CC-JVI. However, challenges emerged due to the incomplete and heterogeneous nature of data at the local level. Most critical metrics for vulnerability assessment are relatively more available at the district, provincial, and national levels. However, qualitative data collected through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) provided rich contextual data that is critical to vulnerability assessment and, more importantly, identification of entry points for interventions to mitigate and adapt to climate change. To address these data challenges, the research adopted another secondary data collection technique, leveraging Statistics South Africa census data from 2011 and 2022, alongside NASA’s online database. This data was normalised and analysed using various statistical methods, revealing significant regional variations in climate vulnerability. KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) exhibited heightened variability attributed to extreme weather events, while Mpumalanga (MP) demonstrated a stable warming trend. Vulnerability indices categorised the Eastern Cape (EC), KZN, and MP as “moderately vulnerable,” while Limpopo (LP) was classified as “vulnerable”, emphasising the necessity of localised assessments. Assessments for 2001 to 2022 show that temperature changes were significant across regions, particularly in KZN and MP. All provinces, including Limpopo, show significant vulnerability despite observable differences in some aspects. These findings indicated the importance of adapting vulnerability assessments to specific regional contexts and emphasised the value of integrating both qualitative and quantitative data into the CC-JVI framework. In conclusion, this study laid a foundational framework for enhancing climate resilience by developing a CC-JVI that reflected regional climatic and socio-economic disparities. Recommendations from this study include establishing a centralised data repository to improve data accessibility and quality, implementing community-based data collection programs, and fostering collaboration among stakeholders. Furthermore, integrating climate adaptation strategies into existing national policies and prioritising localised initiatives to empower communities to build resilience against climate impacts. A phased, iterative approach to index development was deemed essential in ensuring the involvement of local communities in validating the index. Report

2025-07-30T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1654 2025-07-01T14:05:46Z 2025-07-01T00:00:00Z

Limpopo Provincial Research Ethics Committee General Standard Operating procedures and guidelines

2025-07-01T00:00:00Z LPREC http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1653 2025-07-01T13:23:28Z 2025-07-01T00:00:00Z

LPREC STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOPs LPREC Abstract: The purpose of the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) is to clearly articulate the manner in which the Limpopo Provincial Research Ethics Committee (LPREC) operates in as well as promoting the culture of ethical practice when conducting research in the province and ensuring that quality and consistency when reviewing research proposals

2025-07-01T00:00:00Z LPREC http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1650 2025-02-27T12:43:49Z 2025-02-27T00:00:00Z

South African Ethics in Health Research Guidelines LPREC These Guidelines are issued by the South African National Health Research Council (NHREC), under the auspices of the National Department of Health of the Republic of South Africa (NDoH), as mandated by Section 72 of the National Health Act 61 of 2003 (NHA). These Guidelines draw their authority from the NHA and associated regulations, and bind all health and health-related research involving human participants, and the use of animals in research for human health purposes, within South Africa (see also 1.7). The minimum norms and standards for South Africa, as contained in these Guidelines, are established by the NHREC, its application overseen by institutional research ethics committees (RECs) registered with the NHREC, and implemented by the researcher(s) in studies approved by the relevant REC(s). Importantly, the Guidelines are not intended to be a detailed instruction manual, but rather to explain principles and to provide binding normative1 and illustrative informative2 guidance on how to think about the principles in practical contexts.

2025-02-27T00:00:00Z